Blog posts

Collaborating globally for better healthcare


Healthcare is for all.

Here at the Institute of Global Health Innovation, we know there’s no better way to make progress towards this than working together.

Global collaboration allows us to learn from each other’s experiences and successes and can result in unique solutions which carefully consider cultural and systemic differences.

To mark World Health Day, we’re shining a light on five IGHI projects, where working with international partners has brought tremendous benefits when creating innovative responses to healthcare challenges.

(more…)

COVID-19 reveals the injustices that underlie health inequities: what are the implications?

Person receiving vaccine

The COVID-19 pandemic has laid bare the social injustices that are holding back equity in health and care.

People living in poverty and deprivation are some of the hardest to reach and easiest to leave behind.

This means poor people are absorbing much of the brunt of the pandemic’s impacts, faced with challenges that leave them among the worst affected by the virus and exacerbating the struggles they already carry. (more…)

How seldom heard groups are helping us shape our research priorities – learnings so far

Person rubbing alcohol gel onto hands

Last summer, the Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College Health Partners and Imperial College London were successful in being named as one of the five Network Data Labs (NDL) across the UK, funded by the Health Foundation.

This is an extremely exciting opportunity for our partnership. We have the opportunity to work with our local community in North West London to identify research priorities for health and care since COVID-19, and translate those findings into practice – helping to reduce inequalities.

In North West London we are also very fortunate to have access to a linked data set, known as Discover. This provides information from primary care, acute, mental health, community and social care. It gives us the unique opportunity to delve deeper into health inequalities, and use data to try and discover how communities have been affected by the pandemic.

Our first research project has been an analysis of people recommended to shield by the government, and how COVID-19 has affected them. North West London has a very diverse population in terms of income and ethnicity. We therefore wanted to be sure we were working with a range of patients and the public to help inform our research priorities. Two groups we worked closely with are the Imperial Research Partners group, a diverse group of 11 patients and carers, and also Community Voices, a group of community leaders linked to groups representing people from socially disadvantaged backgrounds, those who don’t have English as a first language and a range of other seldom heard communities.

Identifying priorities and concerns

Back in November around 50 people from Community Voices, 40% of whom were from a minority ethnic background and 40% who identified as having a disability, attended a design workshop to help consider two questions. 1) What changes have you noticed in the way that health and care are supported and delivered in North West London since COVID-19? And 2) In terms of the impact COVID-19 has on health and care in the UK, what are our local North West London community priorities for health and care? What are people most worried about and why?

There were two key elements that helped to ensure the workshop could be as productive as possible:

  • Ensuring we had plenty of time to explain the Discover data in plain English, and to allow questions around data security.
  • Having an analyst involved with each breakout session to help ensure emerging themes were issues we could analyse within our data.

A screenshot from the virtual workshop involving seldom heard groups

The impact of COVID-19 on mental health

After the workshop, we collated all of the themes that were raised and the analysts checked whether these themes could be answered using the Discover data set. Seven themes were put into a prioritisation survey. To reach as many North West Londoners as possible, we sent the survey to all the Community Voices network, the workshop attendees and other local community groups, via Twitter, Instagram, the Nextdoor App and Facebook groups for local COVID-19 Mutual Aid Groups. 112 community members completed the survey and the seven themes ranked in this order of importance:

  1. Diagnosis of other conditions
  2. Underserved communities (e.g. people on low incomes)
  3. Mental health
  4. Local availability of services
  5. Access to video consultations
  6. Social and community care
  7. Worse COVID-19 outcomes for minority ethnic groups.

We submitted these findings to the Health Foundation, along with the other NDL members. The next overarching topic we will be working on is the impact of COVID-19 on mental health – one of the top three priorities selected locally. Working with local clinicians and drawing on evidence from recent research and engagement with people with lived experience of mental health, including those from under-represented groups, the Health Foundation have decided our next focus will be on inequalities in children and young people’s access to mental healthcare.

Using data to drive real change

We know the pandemic has particularly impacted children and young people from socially disadvantaged backgrounds, particularly in terms of mental health service provision. So we will use Discover and other data sets to delve deeper into why access to services is so fragmented at the moment. We will also work with young people from North West London with lived experience of mental health conditions. We will discuss what is important to them in health and social care since COVID-19, as well as carers, families and teachers.

Building on learnings from IGHI’s co-produced CCopeY study, which has looked at the impact of lockdown on young people’s mental health, we’ll be making these sessions as interactive and as accessible as possible. Our intention is to use our findings – from both our engagement and our data analysis – to help effect real change locally in North West London. We’re so excited to start this work. And we’re looking forward to sharing our learnings as we progress through the journey.

For more information, or to get involved, please do contact me at a.lawrence-jones@imperial.ac.uk

By Anna Lawrence-Jones, PPIE lead for the Network Data Lab and IGHI

One year on – how our researchers have responded to the pandemic

A COVID-19 antibody testing stick

“We’re in this together.” One year ago, on 11th March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic.

Back then, little over 100,000 cases had been reported globally. Today that number is 1,000 times greater and growing ceaselessly.

With a barely known virus rippling across the world, so too did fear and uncertainty spread as the WHO Director-General addressed all people and nations to make the declaration. Shifting the focus from COVID-19 to people and unity, Dr Tedros also sparked glimmers of optimism by emphasising that innovation and learning would be integral to saving lives and minimising the impact of the pandemic.

Innovation is the beating heart of IGHI, and we’re proud of our community that has joined this long and winding path of discovery in many different ways. A year on, our people reflect on their COVID-19 response journeys and impart the lessons they’ve learned along the way.

Read their stories below.

Tracking COVID-19 past and present – the REACT study

In April 2020 we launched the biggest and most comprehensive study of home coronavirus testing. With colleagues across the College, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, and Ipsos MORI, the REACT programme has been testing hundreds of thousands of people across England every month to track infections past and present. Alongside understanding how many people are currently infected, REACT is identifying people who are most at risk of infection while offering a range of other important insights, such as antibody responses to vaccination. The programme has also worked closely with members of the public to ensure that the research is guided by people’s needs.

This work has been instrumental in the monitoring of England’s epidemic and offers robust, timely evidence on the evolving situation, which is continuing to shape the government’s response.

“One phrase has dominated Government pronouncements on the roadmap out of lockdown: ‘Data, not dates,’” said Professor Ara Darzi, REACT programme sponsor and co-director of IGHI. “And rightly so. The Covid crisis has caused terrible suffering, wrecking lives and livelihoods. But unless we understand it, we cannot defeat it.

“Among the most pressing questions over the last year have been how many people are currently infected with the virus, and how far has it spread through the population? REACT has been a key element of the effort to answer these questions, providing among the most accurate and up-to-date data on its progression across England.

“By regularly testing 160,000 randomly selected people every month, the study has played a vital role in informing the Government’s decision over when to impose lockdown and when to lift it.

“In doing so it has proved the central importance of accurate data gathering to control this and any future pandemic. We forget this lesson at our peril.”

Man with COVID-19 test
Prof Darzi demonstrating an antibody testing kit

Read more about REACT here.

Designing for dementia – Community Makers

Social distancing measures have helped keep the virus at bay, but not without cost. The loneliness and isolation that come with keeping people apart are negatively impacting people’s wellbeing, particularly so for those who depend on support from others in their everyday lives, such as people with dementia.

In response to this issue, our Helix Centre partnered with collaborators to develop a digital resource to help community groups create online networks as a way to maintain support and connection for people affected by dementia. Called Community Makers, the initiative is also building a toolkit of creative ideas for digital involvement, including how to reach people who may not have access to technology.

“Community Makers was a project that addressed a real-time need we saw in the people we were working with through our dementia research,” said Matt Harrison, senior designer at IGHI’s Helix Centre and project lead at Imperial. “People with dementia were some of the least able to adapt to lockdown measures and keep themselves isolated, yet very vulnerable to COVID.

“Collaborating daily with colleagues I have never met in person, at Alzheimer’s Society and University of Worcester, it has been inspiring to work with community groups across the country and see how they have adapted to using digital tools to support their members, and see how technology has evolved to match the need. However, the need is still not met, and there is much more to be done. The post-COVID world will be made up of the best of in-person and digital connections, and we are now seeking funding to help facilitate that change.”

Read more about Community Makers here.

A graphic representing an online dementia community support group
An illustration of Community Makers

Monitoring people’s changing attitudes and behaviours

Washing our hands regularly, taking public transport, avoiding meeting people outside of our household – many of the things we do affect our risk of COVID-19. Public health measures and campaigns have been designed to encourage people to behave in ways that reduce this risk, but how well are people sticking to them? And how are people’s attitudes in relation to the crisis changing over time?

Launched in March 2020 with YouGov, our ongoing COVID-19 health behaviour study is the largest of its kind, surveying thousands of people across the globe every month – half a million in total to date – to understand how citizens are responding to the pandemic. By making the findings freely available, and collaborating with a range of partners, our work is enabling decision-makers to tailor their response based on evidence.

“The stories that emerged, their common threads and their remarkable differences have helped many scientists, public health authorities, members of the press, government leaders and the public to come to grips with many of the driving forces behind the spread of COVID-19,” said Sarah P Jones, project co-creator and doctoral researcher at IGHI.

“When I look back across the year I’m struck by not the divisions sown between us, but by the overwhelming cooperation the world has generated.

“At the beginning of the pandemic I saw every new announcement as a rule, a constraint or a liberty taken away.

“But starting from the very first time YouGov returned our global survey results, I realised something incredible was happening in the world.

“Every hand washed, every mask worn, every metre of distance we placed between ourselves and others have been a gesture towards each other, a signal of respecting one another’s safety.

“I personally cannot wait to get back to hugging, to hearing stories in person and to caring for those I love who are still far away.

“But as we emerge from this cocoon the question on many peoples’ minds should not be “How can we get back to normal?” but rather “Is there anything we cannot accomplish together?

Find out more about the behaviour tracker here.

Understanding the impact of the COVID-driven digital shift in primary care

Digital technologies have been poised to transform the delivery of health care for some time. When the pandemic hit, their promise was quickly put to the test as health systems were forced to shift much of their care from in-person to remote delivery.

Switching from face-to-face consultations to phone calls and video meetings has enabled services to continue while keeping both patients and healthcare staff safe. But what has been the impact for patients and professionals? Our international InSIGHT study has been working with global collaborators to explore this in primary care, using a survey to gather the perspectives of thousands of GPs across 20 countries.

“We were pleased to hear that GPs identified a range of benefits, including reducing COVID-19 transmission risks, guaranteeing access and continuity of care, greater efficiency, faster access to care, and improved convenience for patients,” said study lead Dr Ana Luisa Neves, Advanced Research Fellow and Associate Director of our NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre.

“We also learnt about the main challenges of using remote care, faced by both patients and doctors – digital exclusion from lacking access to technology, clinical uncertainty, potential delays in diagnosis and treatment, and unsuitability for certain types of consultations.

“The work also highlighted other challenges such as the lack of formal guidance, higher workloads, and technical difficulties. Unsurprisingly, digital exclusion and the potential to entrench existing health inequities were among the major concerns of the participants.

“We believe that listening to the GPs’ experience during the pandemic is especially valuable to understand how digital remote care can be safely delivered in the future. We hope we can learn together from this massive real-life experiment and use this opportunity to take the best technology has to offer and change primary care for the better.”

Find out more about InSIGHT here.

How does branding and pricing affect our spending on over-the-counter drugs?

Blister of ibuprofen tabletsWhen we’re having issues with our health, as well as visiting the doctor or hospital, one option we have is purchasing over-the-counter (OTC) medicines to treat ourselves at home.

OTC drugs can be purchased without a prescription from a doctor. They tend to be affordable and have low production costs.

(more…)