{"id":162,"date":"2020-11-02T16:11:42","date_gmt":"2020-11-02T16:11:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/?p=162"},"modified":"2020-11-02T17:14:44","modified_gmt":"2020-11-02T17:14:44","slug":"misinformation-and-social-media-in-the-us-election-comparing-2016-and-2020","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/2020\/11\/02\/misinformation-and-social-media-in-the-us-election-comparing-2016-and-2020\/","title":{"rendered":"Misinformation and social media in the US election: comparing 2016 and 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Written by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.imperial.ac.uk\/people\/j.amador\"><strong>Dr Julio <\/strong><strong>Amador Diaz Lopez<\/strong><\/a>,\u00a0Research Fellow at Imperial College Business School<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Part of the narrative used to explain the Trump presidency has been foreign misinformation in the 2016 election. A lot of research \u2014 investigative such as the Mueller report as well as academic such as ours at Imperial \u2014 has been centred around foreign influence operations. The FBI has concluded that the Internet Research Agency (IRA) conducted active measures to influence public opinion well before the election but constantly in the days leading to Election Day. These measures included well-coordinated efforts to imitate Americans and passing forward information to polarise the public, the objective being to de-incentivise the public from engaging in healthy democratic practices ranging from maintaining civil discussions to voting. In fact, our own research has shown these measures included pushing disinformation related to the latter. In particular, we identified these agents tried to cast doubt about the number of people voting, suggesting a lot of people that were not allowed to vote, were doing so. This may sound familiar.<\/p>\n<p>Voting rights \u2014 who can vote, requirements to cast a vote, and, now, in the times of coronavirus, which absentee ballots will be valid \u2014 have been on the mainstream political debate ever since the Bush administration. The rationale \u2014 or at least a blunt assessment of it \u2014 being: minorities in the US have increasingly become a political force. Hence, making it harder for them to vote will benefit the Republicans as these groups often associate with Democrats. Or, if we follow the GOP\u2019s rationale: Democrats are recruiting people that are not allowed to vote to cast ballots for them.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"wp-image-165 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/files\/2020\/11\/election-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In our 2016 data, we found that many social media posts pushed forward by the IRA indeed used this narrative. However, as this information was being posted by foreigners (remember, the IRA was pushing forward some of these messages), we were able to exploit misspellings and semantics to identify which message came from a foreign influence campaign and which came from within the US. (Remember, regardless of your point of view, it is not illegal to post these messages. It is harmful, however, if a foreigner wants to influence US domestic politics).<\/p>\n<p>Different from the 2016 election, this time most of the misinformation related to voting rights (from slanted opinions to outright lies) is being pushed by the president of the United States. As such, much of the disinformation being discussed in the US is now created and propagated from actors within the US. Therefore, we cannot effectively follow the same strategy to identify misinformation. Most important, within the context of free speech in the United States, this misinformation \u2014 the one created and pushed by American citizens \u2014 is allowed and, some argue, even in the public interest (not because of the content itself, but \u2014the argument goes \u2014 because citizens would be able to identify who is engaging in bad behaviour and be able to electorally punish them). Hence, attention from policymakers has shifted from identifying and banning misinformation to contextualising it; for example, Twitter has opted not for tracking and erasing all posts but putting them behind a warning and precluded its diffusion.<\/p>\n<p>This seems a very reasonable, promising approach. As of now, our understanding of misinformation \u2014 from providing a unified definition to characterising it \u2014 is limited; even more so our ability to catch all pieces of misinformation in the web. Therefore, identifying prominent influencers capable of affecting political discourse and concentrating efforts in contextualising every time they push blatant lies may be reasonable. But this opens another can of worms: do we want social media firms doing this? Do we want governments to do so?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Written by Dr Julio Amador Diaz Lopez,\u00a0Research Fellow at Imperial College Business School Part of the narrative used to explain the Trump presidency has been foreign misinformation in the 2016 election. A lot of research \u2014 investigative such as the Mueller report as well as academic such as ours at Imperial \u2014 has been centred [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1393,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[301891],"tags":[301891,301893],"class_list":["post-162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-policy-engagement","tag-policy-engagement","tag-the-forum"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1393"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=162"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":172,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162\/revisions\/172"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/the-forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}