{"id":614,"date":"2015-04-16T09:20:45","date_gmt":"2015-04-16T09:20:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/?p=614"},"modified":"2015-04-16T11:15:39","modified_gmt":"2015-04-16T11:15:39","slug":"uk-elections-climate-change-debate-is-hampered-by-neoliberal-consensus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/2015\/04\/16\/uk-elections-climate-change-debate-is-hampered-by-neoliberal-consensus\/","title":{"rendered":"UK elections: climate change debate is hampered by neoliberal consensus"},"content":{"rendered":"

By\u00a0Dr Flora Whitmarsh<\/a>,\u00a0Grantham Institute<\/a><\/p>\n

\"BigAlthough both Labour and the Liberal Democrats have pledged to decarbonise the electricity sector by 2030<\/a>, climate change is unlikely to be a key issue in the run up to the May general election. This reflects a long term decline in political engagement with the problem since the Copenhagen conference<\/a> in 2009. Although Copenhagen was held in the immediate wake of the global financial crisis, the ongoing recession and drop in living standards have shifted priorities away from tackling climate change. The increasing cost of energy might also have hardened attitudes towards green policies.<\/p>\n

However, John Ashton, an independent speaker, commentator and adviser who served as the UK\u2019s Special Representative for Climate Change from 2006 to 2012 says, \u201cActing on climate change is part of the solution to that problem.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you want to make the economy less vulnerable to external shocks, if you want to create new drivers for innovation, improve our infrastructure, deal with the terrible problem of cold homes and vulnerable people dying because of cold in the winter, all of those things; a very serious effort to build a low carbon economy will help with that.\u201d<\/p>\n

Politics or policy?<\/h3>\n

According to Ashton, the current generation of politicians hasn\u2019t \u201cengaged politically with climate change, which is quite a serious criticism. They have treated it as a policy issue; and there\u2019s an enormous difference between politics and policy.<\/p>\n

\u201cPolicy is about what you do. Given the sense of identity you have as a political movement, a political party, the values you have, the story you have about our country and where it\u2019s going. Given all of that, what are you going to do?<\/p>\n

\u201cPolitics is not primarily about policy. It is about who we are not what we want to do. It is about the sense of identity itself, the values, the history, the core national story, and how you talk to the country about what all this means for how we feel about ourselves.<\/p>\n

\u201cNone of the mainstream political parties have done that. Moreover they haven\u2019t understood the systemic nature of the climate problem. You can\u2019t have one set of policies in a silo marked, if you like, \u2018energy and climate policies\u2019, and other conflicting policies in a silo called \u2018macroeconomic policies\u2019. Climate change is about the energy system, which is at the foundation of the economy. Changing the energy system means changing the growth model, and therefore intervening structurally using macroeconomic tools.\u201d<\/p>\n

Dyfunctional politics and the rise of neoliberalism<\/h3>\n

In recent decades, the traditional differences between the parties have been eroded by the widespread adoption of the neoliberal prospectus, within a framework of neoclassical economics. Ashton says,<\/p>\n

\u201cAll of the parties have core stories that have been heavily degraded by the sterile doctrines of neoliberalism and the consumer society. So they don\u2019t talk to us very much about who we are, and where we came from, and where we\u2019re going.\u201d<\/p>\n

According to Ashton, this state of affairs has precipitated \u201ca collapse of confidence in politics itself, which we\u2019ll see in the election, reflected by the fact that the vote for the major parties will probably be lower than it\u2019s ever been in my lifetime.\u201d The proportion of the vote going to Labour and the Conservatives collectively<\/a> was 65.9% in 2005 and 67.6% in 2010, down from over 90% in the 1950s.<\/p>\n

Ashton continued, \u201cThis isn\u2019t a problem of dysfunctional climate politics; it\u2019s a problem of dysfunctional politics. Climate change is not the only thing that we\u2019re not talking about that we would be talking about if we had functional politics.<\/p>\n

\u201cTake a different example. A generation ago, Hitler and what he stood for were still fresh in people\u2019s minds. The core political story in Britain and across much of Europe revolved more than it does now around human universality and the need to make sure that the strong look after the weak and vulnerable. We would not then have turned our backs, as we are doing now, on the plight of the refugees drowning every day in the attempt to cross the Mediterranean. Nowadays our leaders still claim the same values but they do not act accordingly. Of course, expediency and narrow self-interest have always to some extent got in the way of moral coherence. But the gap today is wider than it has been for a long time and people sense that.<\/p>\n

\u201cOf course climate change is also a question of justice and solidarity, and some of the refugees are being displaced at least partly by what look like climatic stresses. So the Mediterranean example is not entirely separate.<\/p>\n

Putting climate change on the agenda<\/h3>\n

\u201cIf we want to bring about the political renewal we need, we must all do more to connect \u2018what we want to do\u2019 to \u2018who we are\u2019. Those who aspire to lead us particularly need to focus on this. Building a real political conversation about climate change will have to play a part in that.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you want to reconnect politics to reality, to the reality that people experience, then climate change is a good thing to talk about. But they [British politicians] haven\u2019t found the language, and there\u2019s no time now, between now and the election, to construct the right language for that.\u201d<\/p>\n

So, what can be done to get climate change back onto the political agenda more generally? According to Ashton, the answer doesn\u2019t lie solely in the hands of politicians. Scientists have a key role to play in communicating the implications of climate change.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou need to have much better communication taking place between the world of knowledge, if you like, science, the place where the Grantham Institute has its roots, and the world of choice which is politics, because these have to be political choices informed by science\u201d, says Ashton,<\/p>\n

\u201cI think a challenge for the Grantham Institute<\/a> is to act as a kind of catalyst and stimulant for the rapid upgrade in the skills we need among scientists to get stuck into that challenge.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Read our joint policy brief on\u00a0Climate change priorities for the next UK government<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By\u00a0Dr Flora Whitmarsh,\u00a0Grantham Institute Although both Labour and the Liberal Democrats have pledged to decarbonise the electricity sector by 2030, climate change is unlikely to be a key issue in the run up to the May general election. This reflects a long term decline in political engagement with the problem since the Copenhagen conference in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":741,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17120,996],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mitigation","category-policy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/741"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=614"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/614\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":622,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/614\/revisions\/622"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-staging.imperial.ac.uk\/climate-at-imperial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}